COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN.
SUMMARYIntroduction: Formulas of ideal body weight (IBW) including the body mass index (BMI) of 22 kg/m2 are used under the assumption to provide a healthy weight. Objective: We compare the perceived ideal body weight (PIBW) with the calculated IBW by formulas and the BMI of 22. Methods: We recruite...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León,Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://respyn.uanl.mx/index.php/respyn/article/view/356 |
| _version_ | 1824327635097878528 |
|---|---|
| author | Ramirez López, Erik Puente Hernández, Debbie Negrete López, Nohemí Liliana Serna-Gutiérrez, Araceli Calderón Ramos, Zuli Omaña-Covarrubias, Arianna Flores-Guillen, Elena Tijerina-Sáenz, Alexandra |
| author_facet | Ramirez López, Erik Puente Hernández, Debbie Negrete López, Nohemí Liliana Serna-Gutiérrez, Araceli Calderón Ramos, Zuli Omaña-Covarrubias, Arianna Flores-Guillen, Elena Tijerina-Sáenz, Alexandra |
| author_sort | Ramirez López, Erik |
| collection | Artículos de Revistas UANL |
| description | SUMMARYIntroduction: Formulas of ideal body weight (IBW) including the body mass index (BMI) of 22 kg/m2 are used under the assumption to provide a healthy weight. Objective: We compare the perceived ideal body weight (PIBW) with the calculated IBW by formulas and the BMI of 22. Methods: We recruited 705 women (20-25 y). Six common formulas and 2 published equations by our team were used. Results: Group regression analysis determined that including the frame size improves the agreement of formulas of Robinson et al, Hammond and Hamwi with the PIBW (p>0.05). Individually, the concordance analysis (higher % of differences <2 kg: PIBW - IBW by formula), determined that for a measured BMI <20, only the Faspyn 1 formula needs to be adjusted by frame size; while Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (BMI of 22), Faspyn 2 (BMI of 22) and Broca, are equivalent with the PIBW in different intervals of BMI. Conclusions: According to the BMI perceived as overweight (23.8 kg/m2) and perceived as ideal (21.1 kg/m2), caution is suggested when using the IBW formulas for BMI of 22 as a diagnosis. The IBW formulas and BMI of 22 does not necessarily represent a desirable or aesthetic weight. Comparación del peso percibido como ideal con fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 kg/m2 en mujeres jóvenes.RESUMEN Introducción: El peso ideal calculado con fórmulas (PIF) y con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) de 22 kg/m2 se emplea bajo el supuesto de proporcionar un peso saludable o estético. Objetivo: Comparar el peso percibido como ideal (PPI) contra el PIF y del IMC de 22. Métodos: Se reclutaron 705 mujeres (20-25 años). Empleamos seis fórmulas comunes y 2 publicadas previamente. Resultados: El análisis de regresión grupal determinó que incluir la complexión corporal mejora la concordancia de las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond y Hamwi con el PPI (p>0.05). Individualmente, el análisis de concordancia (porcentaje mayor de diferencias <2 kg: PPI-PIF), determinó que para un IMC <20 kg/m2 solo la fórmula de Faspyn 1 debe ajustarse por la complexión corporal, mientras que las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (IMC de 22), Faspyn 2 (IMC de 22) y Broca, son equivalentes con el PPI en diferentes intervalos de IMC. Conclusiones: de acuerdo con el IMC percibido como sobrepeso (23.8 kg/m2) y percibido como ideal (21.1 kg/m2), las fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 deben ser usados con precaución en el diagnóstico de peso ideal ya que no necesariamente representan un peso deseable o estético. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-05T22:35:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | respyn-article-356 |
| institution | UANL |
| language | spa |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-05T22:35:10Z |
| physical | RESPYN Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018): ENE-MZO 2018; 7-15 RESPYN Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2018): ENE-MZO 2018; 7-15 1870-0160 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León,Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | respyn-article-3562021-07-29T15:01:31Z COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. Ramirez López, Erik Puente Hernández, Debbie Negrete López, Nohemí Liliana Serna-Gutiérrez, Araceli Calderón Ramos, Zuli Omaña-Covarrubias, Arianna Flores-Guillen, Elena Tijerina-Sáenz, Alexandra Ideal body weight formulas perceived ideal body weight BMI of 22 fórmulas de peso ideal peso corporal ideal percibido IMC de 22. SUMMARYIntroduction: Formulas of ideal body weight (IBW) including the body mass index (BMI) of 22 kg/m2 are used under the assumption to provide a healthy weight. Objective: We compare the perceived ideal body weight (PIBW) with the calculated IBW by formulas and the BMI of 22. Methods: We recruited 705 women (20-25 y). Six common formulas and 2 published equations by our team were used. Results: Group regression analysis determined that including the frame size improves the agreement of formulas of Robinson et al, Hammond and Hamwi with the PIBW (p>0.05). Individually, the concordance analysis (higher % of differences <2 kg: PIBW - IBW by formula), determined that for a measured BMI <20, only the Faspyn 1 formula needs to be adjusted by frame size; while Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (BMI of 22), Faspyn 2 (BMI of 22) and Broca, are equivalent with the PIBW in different intervals of BMI. Conclusions: According to the BMI perceived as overweight (23.8 kg/m2) and perceived as ideal (21.1 kg/m2), caution is suggested when using the IBW formulas for BMI of 22 as a diagnosis. The IBW formulas and BMI of 22 does not necessarily represent a desirable or aesthetic weight. Comparación del peso percibido como ideal con fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 kg/m2 en mujeres jóvenes.RESUMEN Introducción: El peso ideal calculado con fórmulas (PIF) y con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) de 22 kg/m2 se emplea bajo el supuesto de proporcionar un peso saludable o estético. Objetivo: Comparar el peso percibido como ideal (PPI) contra el PIF y del IMC de 22. Métodos: Se reclutaron 705 mujeres (20-25 años). Empleamos seis fórmulas comunes y 2 publicadas previamente. Resultados: El análisis de regresión grupal determinó que incluir la complexión corporal mejora la concordancia de las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond y Hamwi con el PPI (p>0.05). Individualmente, el análisis de concordancia (porcentaje mayor de diferencias <2 kg: PPI-PIF), determinó que para un IMC <20 kg/m2 solo la fórmula de Faspyn 1 debe ajustarse por la complexión corporal, mientras que las fórmulas de Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (IMC de 22), Faspyn 2 (IMC de 22) y Broca, son equivalentes con el PPI en diferentes intervalos de IMC. Conclusiones: de acuerdo con el IMC percibido como sobrepeso (23.8 kg/m2) y percibido como ideal (21.1 kg/m2), las fórmulas de peso ideal y el IMC de 22 deben ser usados con precaución en el diagnóstico de peso ideal ya que no necesariamente representan un peso deseable o estético. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León,Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición 2018-05-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion art application/pdf https://respyn.uanl.mx/index.php/respyn/article/view/356 RESPYN Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018): ENE-MZO 2018; 7-15 RESPYN Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2018): ENE-MZO 2018; 7-15 1870-0160 spa https://respyn.uanl.mx/index.php/respyn/article/view/356/316 Derechos de autor 2018 Erik Ramirez López, Debbie Puente Hernández, Nohemí Liliana Negrete López, Araceli Serna-Gutiérrez, Zuli Calderón Ramos, Arianna Omaña-Covarrubias, Elena Flores-Guillen, Alexandra Tijerina-Sáenz |
| spellingShingle | Ideal body weight formulas perceived ideal body weight BMI of 22 fórmulas de peso ideal peso corporal ideal percibido IMC de 22. Ramirez López, Erik Puente Hernández, Debbie Negrete López, Nohemí Liliana Serna-Gutiérrez, Araceli Calderón Ramos, Zuli Omaña-Covarrubias, Arianna Flores-Guillen, Elena Tijerina-Sáenz, Alexandra COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| thumbnail | https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/article.gif |
| title | COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| title_full | COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| title_fullStr | COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| title_short | COMPARISON OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT AS IDEAL AGAINST IDEAL BODY WEIGHT FORMULAS AND BODY MASS INDEX OF 22 KG/M2 IN YOUNG ADULT WOMEN. |
| title_sort | comparison of perceived weight as ideal against ideal body weight formulas and body mass index of 22 kg m2 in young adult women |
| topic | Ideal body weight formulas perceived ideal body weight BMI of 22 fórmulas de peso ideal peso corporal ideal percibido IMC de 22. |
| topic_facet | Ideal body weight formulas perceived ideal body weight BMI of 22 fórmulas de peso ideal peso corporal ideal percibido IMC de 22. |
| url | https://respyn.uanl.mx/index.php/respyn/article/view/356 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ramirezlopezerik comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT puentehernandezdebbie comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT negretelopeznohemililiana comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT sernagutierrezaraceli comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT calderonramoszuli comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT omanacovarrubiasarianna comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT floresguillenelena comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen AT tijerinasaenzalexandra comparisonofperceivedweightasidealagainstidealbodyweightformulasandbodymassindexof22kgm2inyoungadultwomen |