Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism

Few academic studies have focused on how Latin American governments operate online. Political communication studies focused on social media interactions have overwhelmingly dedicated efforts to understand how regular citizens interact and behave online. Through the analysis of hashtags and other onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davalos, Carlos
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rcp.uanl.mx/index.php/rcp/article/view/24
_version_ 1824327142819758080
author Davalos, Carlos
author_facet Davalos, Carlos
author_sort Davalos, Carlos
collection Artículos de Revistas UANL
description Few academic studies have focused on how Latin American governments operate online. Political communication studies focused on social media interactions have overwhelmingly dedicated efforts to understand how regular citizens interact and behave online. Through the analysis of hashtags and other online strategies that were used during Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto’s (EPN) term to critique or manifest unconformity regarding part of the government’s performance, this study observes how members of a Latin American democratic regime weaponized a social media platform to dissipate criticism. More specifically, it proposes that the manipulation of social media affordances can debilitate essential democratic attributes like freedom of expression. Using a qualitative approach, consisting of observation, textual analysis, and online ethnography, findings show that some Mexican government’s manipulation of inconvenient Twitter conversations could impact or even disrupt potential offline crises. Another objective of the presented research is to set a baseline for future efforts focused on how Latin American democratic regimes behave and generate digital communication on social media platforms.
first_indexed 2025-02-05T22:04:13Z
format Article
id rcp-article-24
institution UANL
language spa
last_indexed 2025-02-05T22:04:13Z
physical Revista de Comunicación Política; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Enero - Diciembre 2020; 123-141
Revista de Comunicación Política; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2020): Enero - Diciembre 2020; 123-141
2992-7714
publishDate 2020
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL)
record_format ojs
spelling rcp-article-242024-11-21T16:31:38Z Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism Davalos, Carlos Mexico citizens government social media disruption social capital affordances weaponization Twitter online criticisms Few academic studies have focused on how Latin American governments operate online. Political communication studies focused on social media interactions have overwhelmingly dedicated efforts to understand how regular citizens interact and behave online. Through the analysis of hashtags and other online strategies that were used during Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto’s (EPN) term to critique or manifest unconformity regarding part of the government’s performance, this study observes how members of a Latin American democratic regime weaponized a social media platform to dissipate criticism. More specifically, it proposes that the manipulation of social media affordances can debilitate essential democratic attributes like freedom of expression. Using a qualitative approach, consisting of observation, textual analysis, and online ethnography, findings show that some Mexican government’s manipulation of inconvenient Twitter conversations could impact or even disrupt potential offline crises. Another objective of the presented research is to set a baseline for future efforts focused on how Latin American democratic regimes behave and generate digital communication on social media platforms. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL) 2020-12-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://rcp.uanl.mx/index.php/rcp/article/view/24 Revista de Comunicación Política; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Enero - Diciembre 2020; 123-141 Revista de Comunicación Política; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2020): Enero - Diciembre 2020; 123-141 2992-7714 spa https://rcp.uanl.mx/index.php/rcp/article/view/24/62 Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicación Política https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Mexico
citizens
government
social media
disruption
social capital
affordances
weaponization
Twitter
online
criticisms
Davalos, Carlos
Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
thumbnail https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/article.gif
title Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
title_full Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
title_fullStr Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
title_full_unstemmed Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
title_short Online Dialogue And Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use Of Twitter Affordances To Dissolve Online Criticism
title_sort online dialogue and interaction disruption a latin american government s use of twitter affordances to dissolve online criticism
topic Mexico
citizens
government
social media
disruption
social capital
affordances
weaponization
Twitter
online
criticisms
topic_facet Mexico
citizens
government
social media
disruption
social capital
affordances
weaponization
Twitter
online
criticisms
url https://rcp.uanl.mx/index.php/rcp/article/view/24
work_keys_str_mv AT davaloscarlos onlinedialogueandinteractiondisruptionalatinamericangovernmentsuseoftwitteraffordancestodissolveonlinecriticism