A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks
Different loading conditions cause different tensile stress patterns in masonry structures. Several studies related to masonry behavior use indirect tensile tests to obtain that value, where the splitting test from ASTM-C-1006 is usually employed. In this paper, an experimental analysis of the tensi...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://eprints.uanl.mx/27586/1/27586.pdf |
| _version_ | 1824420774960693248 |
|---|---|
| author | Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto Alvarez Pérez, José Mesa Lavista, Milena Fajardo San Miguel, Gerardo Cavazos de Lira, Diego González Alcorta, Ricardo |
| author_facet | Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto Alvarez Pérez, José Mesa Lavista, Milena Fajardo San Miguel, Gerardo Cavazos de Lira, Diego González Alcorta, Ricardo |
| author_sort | Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto |
| collection | Repositorio Institucional |
| description | Different loading conditions cause different tensile stress patterns in masonry structures. Several studies related to masonry behavior use indirect tensile tests to obtain that value, where the splitting test from ASTM-C-1006 is usually employed. In this paper, an experimental analysis of the tensile strength of hollow concrete blocks is reported. Different locations of the rod from the ASTM-C-1006 splitting test were analyzed. The tensile strength was evaluated in four different ways, placing the rod: (1) in the transversal direction over the gross area, (2) in the transversal direction over the net area, (3) in the longitudinal direction, and (4) 200 mm from the central region of the block in the longitudinal direction. The obtained results were compared with the tensile strength values measured from the direct tensile test in the longitudinal direction. In addition, an axial compressive test was performed to characterize the blocks, and a discussion about the tensile/compression ratio is shown. The experimental results from the splitting tests show that for each configuration setup, the tensile stress is different. The main result was that the splitting test over the net area with the rod positioned in the longitudinal direction can overestimate the tensile strength by more than 21% of the one over the gross area. |
| format | Article |
| id | eprints-27586 |
| institution | UANL |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | eprints-275862024-12-09T15:32:53Z http://eprints.uanl.mx/27586/ A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto Alvarez Pérez, José Mesa Lavista, Milena Fajardo San Miguel, Gerardo Cavazos de Lira, Diego González Alcorta, Ricardo TA Ingeniería General y Civil Different loading conditions cause different tensile stress patterns in masonry structures. Several studies related to masonry behavior use indirect tensile tests to obtain that value, where the splitting test from ASTM-C-1006 is usually employed. In this paper, an experimental analysis of the tensile strength of hollow concrete blocks is reported. Different locations of the rod from the ASTM-C-1006 splitting test were analyzed. The tensile strength was evaluated in four different ways, placing the rod: (1) in the transversal direction over the gross area, (2) in the transversal direction over the net area, (3) in the longitudinal direction, and (4) 200 mm from the central region of the block in the longitudinal direction. The obtained results were compared with the tensile strength values measured from the direct tensile test in the longitudinal direction. In addition, an axial compressive test was performed to characterize the blocks, and a discussion about the tensile/compression ratio is shown. The experimental results from the splitting tests show that for each configuration setup, the tensile stress is different. The main result was that the splitting test over the net area with the rod positioned in the longitudinal direction can overestimate the tensile strength by more than 21% of the one over the gross area. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023-12-30 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_nd http://eprints.uanl.mx/27586/1/27586.pdf http://eprints.uanl.mx/27586/1.haspreviewThumbnailVersion/27586.pdf Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto y Alvarez Pérez, José y Mesa Lavista, Milena y Fajardo San Miguel, Gerardo y Cavazos de Lira, Diego y González Alcorta, Ricardo (2023) A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks. Buildings, 13 (1). pp. 1-15. ISSN 2075-5309 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/1/96 doi:10.3390/buildings13010096 |
| spellingShingle | TA Ingeniería General y Civil Chávez Gómez, Jorge Humberto Alvarez Pérez, José Mesa Lavista, Milena Fajardo San Miguel, Gerardo Cavazos de Lira, Diego González Alcorta, Ricardo A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| thumbnail | https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/online.png |
| title | A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| title_full | A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| title_fullStr | A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| title_full_unstemmed | A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| title_short | A discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| title_sort | discussion about the rod position in the splitting tensile tests on hollow concrete blocks |
| topic | TA Ingeniería General y Civil |
| url | http://eprints.uanl.mx/27586/1/27586.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chavezgomezjorgehumberto adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT alvarezperezjose adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT mesalavistamilena adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT fajardosanmiguelgerardo adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT cavazosdeliradiego adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT gonzalezalcortaricardo adiscussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT chavezgomezjorgehumberto discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT alvarezperezjose discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT mesalavistamilena discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT fajardosanmiguelgerardo discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT cavazosdeliradiego discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks AT gonzalezalcortaricardo discussionabouttherodpositioninthesplittingtensiletestsonhollowconcreteblocks |