Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training
Abstract The principles of operant conditioning are often applied in canine training. Their correct application requires a good timing, well-defined criteria and a proper rate of reinforcement. Few studies have compared the types of markers of canine training events; the most used are the clicker...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Facultad de Psicología
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uanl.mx/19083/1/diferencias%20clicker%20y%20voz.pdf |
| _version_ | 1824415425985773568 |
|---|---|
| author | González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa Landero Hernández, René Vanegas Farfano, Minerva |
| author_facet | González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa Landero Hernández, René Vanegas Farfano, Minerva |
| author_sort | González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa |
| collection | Repositorio Institucional |
| description | Abstract
The principles of operant conditioning are often applied in canine training. Their correct application requires a good timing, well-defined criteria and a proper rate of reinforcement. Few studies have compared the types of markers of canine training events; the most used are the
clicker and the voice. Objective: to compare the number of reinforcers required to shape seven new behaviors in two canine subjects, contrasting the use of the clicker and the voice as markers of events. Results: there is evidence of equivalence in the number of reinforcers needed to achieve the behavior to shape with the use of the clicker and the use of the voice. Conclusions: at least in this study, the timing and the shaping are not affected by the type of marker of events used.
Resumen
Los principios del condicionamiento operante son frecuentemente aplicados en entrenamiento canino.
Para su correcta aplicación se requiere un buen timing, criterios bien definidos y una correcta tasa de
reforzamiento. Pocos estudios han comparado los tipos de marcadores de eventos en entrenamiento canino, los más usados son el clicker y la voz. Objetivo: comparar el número de reforzadores requeridos al moldear siete conductas nuevas en dos sujetos caninos, comparando el uso del clicker y de la voz como marcadores de eventos. Resultados: indicaron equivalencia en el número de reforzadores necesarios para alcanzar la conducta a moldear con uso del clicker y el uso de la voz. Conclusiones: al menos en este estudio, el timing
y el moldeamiento no se ven afectados por el tipo de marcador de eventos usado. |
| format | Article |
| id | eprints-19083 |
| institution | UANL |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Facultad de Psicología |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | eprints-190832020-06-17T13:15:49Z http://eprints.uanl.mx/19083/ Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa Landero Hernández, René Vanegas Farfano, Minerva BF Psicología SF Ganadería / Medicina veretrinaria Abstract The principles of operant conditioning are often applied in canine training. Their correct application requires a good timing, well-defined criteria and a proper rate of reinforcement. Few studies have compared the types of markers of canine training events; the most used are the clicker and the voice. Objective: to compare the number of reinforcers required to shape seven new behaviors in two canine subjects, contrasting the use of the clicker and the voice as markers of events. Results: there is evidence of equivalence in the number of reinforcers needed to achieve the behavior to shape with the use of the clicker and the use of the voice. Conclusions: at least in this study, the timing and the shaping are not affected by the type of marker of events used. Resumen Los principios del condicionamiento operante son frecuentemente aplicados en entrenamiento canino. Para su correcta aplicación se requiere un buen timing, criterios bien definidos y una correcta tasa de reforzamiento. Pocos estudios han comparado los tipos de marcadores de eventos en entrenamiento canino, los más usados son el clicker y la voz. Objetivo: comparar el número de reforzadores requeridos al moldear siete conductas nuevas en dos sujetos caninos, comparando el uso del clicker y de la voz como marcadores de eventos. Resultados: indicaron equivalencia en el número de reforzadores necesarios para alcanzar la conducta a moldear con uso del clicker y el uso de la voz. Conclusiones: al menos en este estudio, el timing y el moldeamiento no se ven afectados por el tipo de marcador de eventos usado. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Facultad de Psicología 2017-07 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_nd http://eprints.uanl.mx/19083/1/diferencias%20clicker%20y%20voz.pdf http://eprints.uanl.mx/19083/1.haspreviewThumbnailVersion/diferencias%20clicker%20y%20voz.pdf González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa y Landero Hernández, René y Vanegas Farfano, Minerva (2017) Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training. Informes Psicológicos, 17 (2). pp. 67-77. ISSN 2145-3535 doi:10.18566/infpsic. v17n2a03 |
| spellingShingle | BF Psicología SF Ganadería / Medicina veretrinaria González Ramírez, Mónica Teresa Landero Hernández, René Vanegas Farfano, Minerva Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| thumbnail | https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/online.png |
| title | Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| title_full | Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| title_fullStr | Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| title_short | Differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| title_sort | differences between clicker and voice when used as event markers in shaping novel behaviors in dog training |
| topic | BF Psicología SF Ganadería / Medicina veretrinaria |
| url | http://eprints.uanl.mx/19083/1/diferencias%20clicker%20y%20voz.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalezramirezmonicateresa differencesbetweenclickerandvoicewhenusedaseventmarkersinshapingnovelbehaviorsindogtraining AT landerohernandezrene differencesbetweenclickerandvoicewhenusedaseventmarkersinshapingnovelbehaviorsindogtraining AT vanegasfarfanominerva differencesbetweenclickerandvoicewhenusedaseventmarkersinshapingnovelbehaviorsindogtraining |