Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research

Quantitative psychological research is focused on detecting the occurrence of certain population phenomena by analyzing data from a sample, and statistics is a particularly helpful mathematical tool that is used by researchers to evaluate hypotheses and make decisions to accept or reject such hypoth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Téllez López, Arnoldo, Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto, Corral Verdugo, Victor
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2015
Acceso en línea:http://eprints.uanl.mx/14991/1/160.pdf
_version_ 1824414215497056256
author Téllez López, Arnoldo
Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto
Corral Verdugo, Victor
author_facet Téllez López, Arnoldo
Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto
Corral Verdugo, Victor
author_sort Téllez López, Arnoldo
collection Repositorio Institucional
description Quantitative psychological research is focused on detecting the occurrence of certain population phenomena by analyzing data from a sample, and statistics is a particularly helpful mathematical tool that is used by researchers to evaluate hypotheses and make decisions to accept or reject such hypotheses. In this paper, the various statistical tools in psychological research are reviewed. The limitations of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and the advantages of using effect size and its respective confidence intervals are explained, as the latter two measurements can provide important information about the results of a study. These measurements also can facilitate data interpretation and easily detect trivial effects, enabling researchers to make decisions in a more clinically relevant fashion. Moreover, it is recommended to establish an appropriate sample size by calculating the optimum statistical power at the moment that the research is designed. Psychological journal editors are encouraged to follow APA recommendations strictly and ask authors of original research studies to report the effect size, its confidence intervals, statistical power and, when required, any measure of clinical significance. Additionally, we must account for the teaching of statistics at the graduate level. At that level, students do not receive sufficient information concerning the importance of using different types of effect sizes and their confidence intervals according to the different types of research designs; instead, most of the information is focused on the various tools of NHST.
format Article
id eprints-14991
institution UANL
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format eprints
spelling eprints-149912024-12-09T22:06:22Z http://eprints.uanl.mx/14991/ Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research Téllez López, Arnoldo Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto Corral Verdugo, Victor Quantitative psychological research is focused on detecting the occurrence of certain population phenomena by analyzing data from a sample, and statistics is a particularly helpful mathematical tool that is used by researchers to evaluate hypotheses and make decisions to accept or reject such hypotheses. In this paper, the various statistical tools in psychological research are reviewed. The limitations of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and the advantages of using effect size and its respective confidence intervals are explained, as the latter two measurements can provide important information about the results of a study. These measurements also can facilitate data interpretation and easily detect trivial effects, enabling researchers to make decisions in a more clinically relevant fashion. Moreover, it is recommended to establish an appropriate sample size by calculating the optimum statistical power at the moment that the research is designed. Psychological journal editors are encouraged to follow APA recommendations strictly and ask authors of original research studies to report the effect size, its confidence intervals, statistical power and, when required, any measure of clinical significance. Additionally, we must account for the teaching of statistics at the graduate level. At that level, students do not receive sufficient information concerning the importance of using different types of effect sizes and their confidence intervals according to the different types of research designs; instead, most of the information is focused on the various tools of NHST. 2015 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_nd http://eprints.uanl.mx/14991/1/160.pdf http://eprints.uanl.mx/14991/1.haspreviewThumbnailVersion/160.pdf Téllez López, Arnoldo y Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto y Corral Verdugo, Victor (2015) Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8 (3). pp. 27-46. ISSN 20746857 http://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0303 doi:10.11621/pir.2015.0303
spellingShingle Téllez López, Arnoldo
Garcia Cadena, Cirilo Humberto
Corral Verdugo, Victor
Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
thumbnail https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/online.png
title Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
title_full Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
title_fullStr Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
title_full_unstemmed Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
title_short Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
title_sort effect size confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research
url http://eprints.uanl.mx/14991/1/160.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tellezlopezarnoldo effectsizeconfidenceintervalsandstatisticalpowerinpsychologicalresearch
AT garciacadenacirilohumberto effectsizeconfidenceintervalsandstatisticalpowerinpsychologicalresearch
AT corralverdugovictor effectsizeconfidenceintervalsandstatisticalpowerinpsychologicalresearch