The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test
Here, we compared the maximal lactate steady state velocity (vMLSS) estimated from a single-visit protocol (v5 × 2000) to the traditional multi-day protocol (vMLSS). Furthermore, we determined whether there was a lactate steady state during the time limits (Tlim) at vMLSS or v5 × 2000. Eight runners...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uanl.mx/12293/7/12293.pdf |
| _version_ | 1824413494419652608 |
|---|---|
| author | Legaz Arrese, Alejandro Carranza García, Luis Enrique Serrano Ostáriz, Enrique González Ravé, J. M. Terrados, Nicolás |
| author_facet | Legaz Arrese, Alejandro Carranza García, Luis Enrique Serrano Ostáriz, Enrique González Ravé, J. M. Terrados, Nicolás |
| author_sort | Legaz Arrese, Alejandro |
| collection | Repositorio Institucional |
| description | Here, we compared the maximal lactate steady state velocity (vMLSS) estimated from a single-visit protocol (v5 × 2000) to the traditional multi-day protocol (vMLSS). Furthermore, we determined whether there was a lactate steady state during the time limits (Tlim) at vMLSS or v5 × 2000. Eight runners completed a half marathon (HM), the traditional protocol to determine the vMLSS and the 5 × 2000 m test in a randomised order, and a Tlim at vMLSS and at v5 × 2000 in a randomised order. The vMLSS (13.56 ± 0.90 km·h − 1 ) was higher than the v5 × 2000 (12.93 ± 0.90 km·h − 1 , p = 0.001) and comparable to the vHM (13.34 ± 0.75 km·h − 1 ). The vMLSS (r = 0.83) and the v5 × 2000 (r = 0.91) were associated with the vHM but were not indicative of the competition pace. The Tlim at vMLSS (64 ± 15 min) was lower than the Tlim at v5 × 2000 (94 ± 21 min) and the HM time (95 ± 5 min). In both Tlim, lactate was lower at 45 min than upon fi nishing the eff ort and was predictive of its duration (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the 5 × 2000 m test can be equally useful to assess runners as the traditional MLSS protocol and that there is no lactate steady state
during the Tlim at vMLSS or at v5 × 2000 |
| format | Article |
| id | eprints-12293 |
| institution | UANL |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | eprints-122932021-10-04T12:48:23Z http://eprints.uanl.mx/12293/ The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test Legaz Arrese, Alejandro Carranza García, Luis Enrique Serrano Ostáriz, Enrique González Ravé, J. M. Terrados, Nicolás GV Deportes y Recreación Here, we compared the maximal lactate steady state velocity (vMLSS) estimated from a single-visit protocol (v5 × 2000) to the traditional multi-day protocol (vMLSS). Furthermore, we determined whether there was a lactate steady state during the time limits (Tlim) at vMLSS or v5 × 2000. Eight runners completed a half marathon (HM), the traditional protocol to determine the vMLSS and the 5 × 2000 m test in a randomised order, and a Tlim at vMLSS and at v5 × 2000 in a randomised order. The vMLSS (13.56 ± 0.90 km·h − 1 ) was higher than the v5 × 2000 (12.93 ± 0.90 km·h − 1 , p = 0.001) and comparable to the vHM (13.34 ± 0.75 km·h − 1 ). The vMLSS (r = 0.83) and the v5 × 2000 (r = 0.91) were associated with the vHM but were not indicative of the competition pace. The Tlim at vMLSS (64 ± 15 min) was lower than the Tlim at v5 × 2000 (94 ± 21 min) and the HM time (95 ± 5 min). In both Tlim, lactate was lower at 45 min than upon fi nishing the eff ort and was predictive of its duration (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the 5 × 2000 m test can be equally useful to assess runners as the traditional MLSS protocol and that there is no lactate steady state during the Tlim at vMLSS or at v5 × 2000 Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2011 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_nd http://eprints.uanl.mx/12293/7/12293.pdf http://eprints.uanl.mx/12293/7.haspreviewThumbnailVersion/12293.pdf Legaz Arrese, Alejandro y Carranza García, Luis Enrique y Serrano Ostáriz, Enrique y González Ravé, J. M. y Terrados, Nicolás (2011) The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test. International journal of sports medicine, 32 (11). pp. 845-850. ISSN 0172-4622 doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283178 |
| spellingShingle | GV Deportes y Recreación Legaz Arrese, Alejandro Carranza García, Luis Enrique Serrano Ostáriz, Enrique González Ravé, J. M. Terrados, Nicolás The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| thumbnail | https://rediab.uanl.mx/themes/sandal5/images/online.png |
| title | The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| title_full | The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| title_fullStr | The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| title_full_unstemmed | The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| title_short | The traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5× 2000 m test |
| title_sort | traditional maximal lactate steady state test versus the 5 2000 m test |
| topic | GV Deportes y Recreación |
| url | http://eprints.uanl.mx/12293/7/12293.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT legazarresealejandro thetraditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT carranzagarcialuisenrique thetraditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT serranoostarizenrique thetraditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT gonzalezravejm thetraditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT terradosnicolas thetraditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT legazarresealejandro traditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT carranzagarcialuisenrique traditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT serranoostarizenrique traditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT gonzalezravejm traditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest AT terradosnicolas traditionalmaximallactatesteadystatetestversusthe52000mtest |